From disaffection to desertion: How networks facilitate military insubordination in civil conflict
Author's Department
Political Science Department
Find in your Library
https://doi.org/10.5129/001041516819197601
Document Type
Research Article
Publication Title
Comparative Politics
Publication Date
7-1-2016
doi
10.5129/001041516819197601
Abstract
Scholarship on intrastate conflict and civil-military relations has largely ignored individual desertions during civil war. We show that high-risk behavior, such as desertion, is best thought of as coordinated action between individual decision-makers and their strong network ties. Soldiers hold preexisting opinions on whether high-risk action is worthwhile, but it is their networks that persuade them to act. Specifically, it is the content of strong network ties (rather than their mere existence) and the ability to interpret information (rather than the presence of information), which helps explain individual action under extreme risk. Our thick empirical narrative is based on substantial fieldwork on the Syrian conflict and contributes to debates on military cohesion, intrastate conflict trajectories, and the power of networks in catalyzing high-risk behavior.
First Page
439
Last Page
457
Recommended Citation
APA Citation
Koehler, K.
Ohl, D.
&
Albrecht, H.
(2016). From disaffection to desertion: How networks facilitate military insubordination in civil conflict. Comparative Politics, 48(4), 439–457.
10.5129/001041516819197601
https://fount.aucegypt.edu/faculty_journal_articles/1325
MLA Citation
Koehler, Kevin, et al.
"From disaffection to desertion: How networks facilitate military insubordination in civil conflict." Comparative Politics, vol. 48,no. 4, 2016, pp. 439–457.
https://fount.aucegypt.edu/faculty_journal_articles/1325