Erica Dunham

Abstract

While current scholarship often points to a direct link between the ideology of Young Turks and the Kemalists, a closer analysis indicates there are many breaks in this link. This thesis analyzes the main influences on the Young Turk movement and the emergence and rise to power of the Kemalist movement, highlighting points of difference in the two movements' ideologies and practices. Although the Young Turk movement influenced the Kemalist movement in the early years of the Turkish Republic, this thesis seeks to highlight the differences and discontinuities that existed between them. While many ideas from the Young Turk movement did carry over to the Kemalist movement, the extent and form of some of ideas differed. Scholars acknowledge that the Young Turk movement included numerous factions, whose ideology and practices differed greatly. Noticeable divides existed within the Young Turk movement, particularly between the movement's leadership and its radical faction, the garbcilar. It is the ideology of the Young Turk leadership's inner circle, the Central Committee, which is often compared with that of the Kemalists. However, many of the notable individuals who went on to lead and contribute to the ideology of the Kemalist movement were actually associated with the garbcilar and did not play a role in the Central Committee. In support of this argument, I will point to how the garbcilar, rather than the CUP central leadership, provided much of the inspiration for the radical aspects of Kemalist ideology and policies that prevailed in the early twentieth century. To be clear, this thesis does not seek to discredit or disprove current scholarship, but rather to present the relationship between the ideology of the Young Turk and Kemalist movements through a different lens. By tracing the ideological links of the Kemalists back to the Young Turk movement, this thesis will highlight the limits of ideological continuity. In doing so, it will contribute to the existing scholarly literature on Ottoman and early Turkish thought in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

Department

Middle East Studies Center

Degree Name

MA in Middle East Studies

Graduation Date

6-1-2017

Submission Date

May 2017

First Advisor

Hojairi, Mouannes

Committee Member 1

Ghazaleh, Pascale

Committee Member 2

Mason, Robert

Extent

72 p.

Document Type

Master's Thesis

Rights

The author retains all rights with regard to copyright. The author certifies that written permission from the owner(s) of third-party copyrighted matter included in the thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study has been obtained. The author further certifies that IRB approval has been obtained for this thesis, or that IRB approval is not necessary for this thesis. Insofar as this thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study is an educational record as defined in the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) (20 USC 1232g), the author has granted consent to disclosure of it to anyone who requests a copy.

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval

Not necessary for this item

Download

Share

COinS