Political militaries in popular uprisings: A comparative perspective on the Arab Spring
Author's Department
Political Science Department
Find in your Library
https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512116639746
Document Type
Research Article
Publication Title
International Political Science Review
Publication Date
6-1-2017
doi
10.1177/0192512116639746
Abstract
© 2016, © The Author(s) 2016. What determines whether militaries will defect from authoritarian incumbents during regime crises? Variance in military behavior in the Arab Spring has given rise to a debate around this issue. This article highlights weaknesses of the dominant explanation and develops an alternative account of military behavior in ‘endgame scenarios’. If militaries are politicized institutions that play a major role in regulating access to power under authoritarianism, they are more likely to intervene during normal times, but less likely to defect during mass uprisings. I quantitatively test this argument against data on military coups between 1975 and 2000 drawing on a new variable that allows me to explicitly model the impact of major regime crises. I illustrate the emergence of different forms of political–military relations and their consequences in the Arab Spring by drawing on evidence from Syria, Egypt, and Tunisia.
First Page
363
Last Page
377
Recommended Citation
APA Citation
Koehler, K.
(2017). Political militaries in popular uprisings: A comparative perspective on the Arab Spring. International Political Science Review, 38(3), 363–377.
10.1177/0192512116639746
https://fount.aucegypt.edu/faculty_journal_articles/729
MLA Citation
Koehler, Kevin
"Political militaries in popular uprisings: A comparative perspective on the Arab Spring." International Political Science Review, vol. 38,no. 3, 2017, pp. 363–377.
https://fount.aucegypt.edu/faculty_journal_articles/729