Investigation on Crumb Rubber (CR) and Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE) Modified Asphalt Concrete Pavement Design, Performance, and Carbon Footprint

Funding Sponsor

American University in Cairo

Author's Department

Construction Engineering Department

Fifth Author's Department

Construction Engineering Department

Find in your Library

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-95111-4_10

All Authors

Mohamed Atef Ehab Abdelhamid Mohamed Ashmawy Marwan Shawki Mohamed Elnakeb Marina Moawad Mohamed Darwish May Haggag Donia Eldwib Khaled Nassar Maram Saudy Safwan Khedr Minas Guirguis Mohamed Naguib Abouzeid

Document Type

Research Article

Publication Title

Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering

Publication Date

1-1-2025

doi

10.1007/978-3-031-95111-4_10

Abstract

Due to the exponential growth of infrastructure, there is an increasing demand for asphalt-paved roads, which are posing environmental threats due to rising carbon emissions and non-biodegradable wastes. Non-biodegradable waste materials such as low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and crumb rubber (CR) have become more prevalent in landfills due to the increased dependence on plastic bags and the constantly rising demand for rubber tire-dependent vehicles. This research aims to study the integration of these waste materials into asphalt concrete, with a focus on reducing carbon emissions while reducing costs. Using CR and LDPE, a virgin asphalt binder with grade PG 64-22 was modified. Using the Superpave mix design method, hot mix asphalt (HMA) mixture alternatives for pavement treated base (TB) and pavement's wearing surface layers were designed using CR and LDPE-modified asphalt blends. Both modified asphalt mixes were characterized in reference to the control mix (with unmodified binder). Findings indicate that adding waste materials, like LDPE and crumb rubber, to asphalt pavement enhances its functionality. The LDPE-modified base and wearing surface (alternative 2) is found to be the best alternative in terms of carbon emissions, with reductions reaching 84 percent when compared to alternative 4 (control mix with no modifications). Although the initial costs of the three modified alternatives 1, 2, and 3 are all comparatively similar, waste-incorporated mixes with LDPE and crumb rubber have resulted in reduced life cycle costs by 54%.

First Page

141

Last Page

152

Share

COinS