How Bashar al-Asad Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the "war on Terror"

Author's Department

Political Science Department

Find in your Library

https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae066

All Authors

Sean Lee

Document Type

Research Article

Publication Title

International Studies Quarterly

Publication Date

6-1-2024

doi

10.1093/isq/sqae066

Abstract

This article draws on regime newspaper archives and the Arabic-language speeches of and interviews with Syrian president Bashar al-Asad over the last two decades to track how Syrian governmental rhetoric on the question of terrorism has changed over time. Engaging with the literature on how ideas, technologies, and contentious repertoires diffuse and spread and how regimes learn from each other, I show how the Asad regime has moved from a discourse that saw terrorism as a West- ern and/or Israeli concept used to delegitimize primarily Palestinian and Lebanese resistance sponsored by Damascus to a discourse that embraces the rhetoric of the war on terror in order to legitimize the regime's counterinsurgency policies during the current conflict. I argue that this rhetorical shift is dependent on the ethno-sectarian identity of the population in question through a comparison of regime rhetoric on three separate uprisings in recent Syrian history: the current uprising (2011-present); the Kurdish uprising of 2004; and the Druze uprising in 2000. Since the current uprising is seen as a predom- inantly Sunni Arab affair, the Syrian regime has used war on terror rhetoric in ways that it did not during the Kurdish and Druze uprisings. I then situate this rhetorical move in time as a post-9/11 development by comparing current regime rhetoric with that of the Hafez al-Asad regime's rhetoric during the uprising centered in Hama in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

Comments

Article. Record derived from SCOPUS.

Link to Full Text
Find this item online

Share

COinS