Entanglement and relation: A response to Bruno Latour and Ian Hodder

Author's Department

Philosophy Department

Find in your Library

https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2014.0007

Document Type

Research Article

Publication Title

New Literary History

Publication Date

1-1-2014

doi

10.1353/nlh.2014.0007

Abstract

In this article Graham Harman responds to pieces by the philosopher of science Bruno Latour and the archaeologist Ian Hodder in the same issue of New Literary History. A brief summary is given of Latour's intellectual career, including his recent transition from actor-network theory to the "modes of existence" project. An asymmetry in Latour's approach is also identified: though he abolishes both nature and culture as distinct realms of being, he retains and expands the "foritself" of culture even while abolishing the "in-itself" of nature. An opposite problem is identified in Hodder's approach, which takes account of the virtue of the nonrelationality of things, but which retains the very nature/culture dualism that Latour had succeeded in dismantling. This leads Hodder in the direction of an untenable politics guided by the model of prehistoric humans uncontaminated by excessive dependence on things.

First Page

37

Last Page

49

This document is currently not available here.

Find this item online

Share

COinS