This study will aim at examining how the changes in Israelâ s security environment affected the strategic usefulness of its nuclear deterrent. The Israeli nuclear deterrent was developed during the 1950s and the 1960s when Israelâ s strategic setting was, mainly, dominated by state-centered security threats. Consequently, Israel, at the time, was mainly concerned with the possible symmetrical military confrontations with its Arab neighbors; something that would have created strategic value for the Israeli nuclear deterrent. Yet, a closer examination of the evolution of the Israeli security environment since 1982 will reveal that Non-State Actors (NSAs) and asymmetrical forms of warfare, slowly but surely, have dominated the Israeli security setting. The year 1982 is chosen because it is the date of the last major military confrontation between Israel and another state (Syria in that case) in a symmetrical form of warfare. Since then, Israelâ s major security threats originated from NSAs either operating from neighboring states (as in the case of Hezbollah in Lebanon) and/or Palestinian groups operating in Israel or from the occupied Arab territories in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The most obvious example of this new type of threats is the highly successful campaign launched by Hezbollah, throughout the 1980s and 1990s, against the Israeli occupation of Southern Lebanon, which eventually led to an Israeli withdrawal in 2000. In this campaign Hezbollah depended on asymmetrical forms of warfare that left the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) entangled in a long and destructive war of attrition. In addition to Hezbollah, both the first and the second Intifadas proved to be a great security threat to Israel, as the Palestinians, generally and more so in the second Intifada, devised and restored to asymmetrical means of warfare that proved hard to break using conventional military means. This rise of threats stemming mainly of NSAs and asymmetrical means of warfare was coupled with the simultaneous and relative decline of state-centered security threats; which are threats mainly originating from states mounting regular and symmetrical wars. In fact, this relative decline of state-centered security threats initiated by a complex set of, often interrelated, political and strategic factors. This study will aim, first, at providing a comprehensive overview of how and which context did Israel develop its nuclear deterrent and how was it related to the Israeli self-perception and strategy of deterrence. Second, the study will tackle the changes that took place in Israelâ s strategic setting over the past three decades; discussing, in the process, the various political and strategic factors that led to the decline of the state-centered security threats and the simultaneous rise of NSAs as Israelâ s main security threat. Finally, the effect of this change in Israelâ s threat map on the usefulness of Israeli nuclear deterrent will be examined.
School of Humanities and Social Sciences
MA in Political Science
The American University in Cairo grants authors of theses and dissertations a maximum embargo period of two years from the date of submission, upon request. After the embargo elapses, these documents are made available publicly. If you are the author of this thesis or dissertation, and would like to request an exceptional extension of the embargo period, please write to email@example.com
Nasr el-Din, A.
(2021).Israeli nuclear deterrence: the failure of a concept: "how did the change in Israel's strategic context affect the usefulness of the Israeli nuclear deterrent?" [Thesis, the American University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain.
Nasr el-Din, Amr. Israeli nuclear deterrence: the failure of a concept: "how did the change in Israel's strategic context affect the usefulness of the Israeli nuclear deterrent?". 2021. American University in Cairo, Thesis. AUC Knowledge Fountain.