Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (hereinafter "GATT") and the World Trade Organization (hereinafter "WTO") Anti-dumping Agreement (hereinafter "ADA") permit WTO members to impose anti-dumping duties as a result of an anti-dumping investigation if any member concludes that a certain product, imported to its territory, has caused or threatens to cause a serious injury to its domestic industry. Accordingly, this member may increase tariffs on this imported product by a specific amount calculated through certain methodologies for each foreign exporter/producer whose imports are subject to the concluded investigation. However, Article VI of GATT and the ADA do not condemn dumping as price discrimination but condemn the product dumping situations causing or threatening to cause material injury to the domestic industry. Consequently, the dumping practice itself is not the only reason for allowing any party to impose anti-dumping duties. The most important factor in the anti-dumping investigation process is to provide clear analysis that dumped imports have indeed caused or threaten to cause serious injury to the domestic industry. Unfortunately, the ADA does not provide members with clear provisions on how to reach this conclusion. In addition, and according to Article 11.1 of the ADA, the imposition of “anti-dumping duty shall remain in force only as long as and to the extent necessary to counter dumping which is causing injury.” The ADA provisions also do not provide clear and objective analysis guidelines to determine whether a member should eliminate anti-dumping duties. The weaknesses of this Agreement, which exist in significant and crucial provisions, such as those relating to injury and causality determinations, or the review of the anti-dumping duties with respect to their level and duration, encourage WTO members to abuse these rules by overprotecting their domestic industries. The extensive use of this tool destroys the main purpose of this Agreement, to stop or hinder injury that is caused by dumped imports. These weaknesses, which undermine the objectivity of the anti-dumping investigations, distort international trade by imposing various anti-dumping duties on numerous foreign products, which are not necessarily causing or threatening to cause material injury.
LLM in International and Comparative Law
Date of Award
Online Submission Date
Committee Member 1
Committee Member 2
Library of Congress Subject Heading 1
World Trade Organization -- History.
The author retains all rights with regard to copyright. The author certifies that written permission from the owner(s) of third-party copyrighted matter included in the thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study has been obtained. The author further certifies that IRB approval has been obtained for this thesis, or that IRB approval is not necessary for this thesis. Insofar as this thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study is an educational record as defined in the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) (20 USC 1232g), the author has granted consent to disclosure of it to anyone who requests a copy. The author has granted the American University in Cairo or its agents a non-exclusive license to archive this thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study, and to make it accessible, in whole or in part, in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
Not necessary for this item
Abo Elnour, A.
(2010).Highlighting the major weaknesses of the WTO anti-dumping agreement which cause international market distortion [Master’s thesis, the American University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain.
Abo Elnour, Ahmed. Highlighting the major weaknesses of the WTO anti-dumping agreement which cause international market distortion. 2010. American University in Cairo, Master's thesis. AUC Knowledge Fountain.